Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 5:59:43 GMT -5
To that I would add another question of equal importance. If fascists appear as Eco says disguised as democrats how do we distinguish antifascist democrats from fascist democrats That is who has the right to define themselves as an antifascist democrat if for example as Gramsci did we call socialists like Filippo Turati liberals like Giovanni Amendola and democratic Catholics like Luigi Sturzo semifascists And how do we say that the real antifascist was Gramsci who was imprisoned in while Matteotti was assassinated in Amendola was attacked in and and Sturzo was forced into exile in and Turati in The same goes for the concept that fascism can repeat itself in other forms and it is up to democrats to unmask it. Such a position gives a kind of totalitarian power to the socalled democrats to decide how when and who is a fascist in disguise. With that criterion everyone could say you are the fascist I am the true antifascist.
I always had great admiration for Umberto Eco a semiotician with Russia Mobile Number List knowledge of rhetoric and also history. But I could not and cannot agree with him when he affirms his thesis of eternal fascism. be sustained in history when not even the divinities are revealed to be eternal Where are Jupiter and Apollo today Where are the gods of Persia Are we sure that Christianity and Islam will be eternal Until now in fact they have lived less than the Egyptian religion. In history nothing is eternal.
It is absurd to speak of eternity in history. And on the other hand would only fascism be eternal I dont see anyone talking about an eternal liberalism or an eternal Bolshevism an eternal Jacobinism or to refer to your country an eternal Peronism. It seems that only fascism was endowed with eternity. But if fascism is eternal then every antifascist is defeated beforehand. He will never win because apparently his opponent is the possessor of a unique gift that no other ideology or any other regime has eternity. This supposed character of Eternity is based as he told him on the practice of analogies. It is based on attributing the category of fascist to nonfascist movements or regime.
I always had great admiration for Umberto Eco a semiotician with Russia Mobile Number List knowledge of rhetoric and also history. But I could not and cannot agree with him when he affirms his thesis of eternal fascism. be sustained in history when not even the divinities are revealed to be eternal Where are Jupiter and Apollo today Where are the gods of Persia Are we sure that Christianity and Islam will be eternal Until now in fact they have lived less than the Egyptian religion. In history nothing is eternal.
It is absurd to speak of eternity in history. And on the other hand would only fascism be eternal I dont see anyone talking about an eternal liberalism or an eternal Bolshevism an eternal Jacobinism or to refer to your country an eternal Peronism. It seems that only fascism was endowed with eternity. But if fascism is eternal then every antifascist is defeated beforehand. He will never win because apparently his opponent is the possessor of a unique gift that no other ideology or any other regime has eternity. This supposed character of Eternity is based as he told him on the practice of analogies. It is based on attributing the category of fascist to nonfascist movements or regime.